ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

3:28pm 24/01/2024
Font
Najib’s pardon will shatter reputations
By:Mariam Mokhtar

There has been a lot of chatter on social media about the convicted felon, Najib Abdul Razak, receiving a royal pardon.

Should we be worried about this matter? Or should it be the authorities who should treat this matter with extreme seriousness?

The new King will be installed by the end of this month. The current Agong is from the same state as Najib, and the new one is from Johor.

The Agong has the exclusive right to grant Najib his pardon, but granting Najib the pardon will do irreparable damage to the royal household. The citizens’ faith and trust in the King will plummet.

Najib’s pardon will send mixed messages to Malaysians as well as the international community.

Only Najib and his hard-core supporters will benefit; but everyone else, from the Agong to Anwar, the judiciary, the Pardons Board, the rakyat, and the country, will suffer.

Any person who is sane, level-headed, and law-abiding knows the consequences and damage to the nation that Najib’s pardon will bring.

The pardon will encourage more criminal activities, as it undermines our efforts to curb the abuse of power, money politics, theft of taxpayers’ money, injustice and embezzlement.

Many Malaysians supported Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim when he campaigned on an anti-corruption election ticket, to eradicate corruption and punish people who commit the offence.

If there were to be a royal pardon, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) should be dissolved. What’s the point of an anti-corruption body if the person found guilty of corruption is released?

The people will also wonder why they should obey the laws of the land when elite Malaysians who commit crimes are released back into society, as if they have not done anything wrong.

Their reputations remain intact, or are probably enhanced. They also get to keep the spoils of corruption.

A pardoned Najib would most certainly try and get his job back as PM.

The deputy PM, Zahid Hamidi, who is also the Umno leader, will constantly have to watch his back.

Najib’s pardon could go two ways. It could galvanise Umno or break it up further as its members realign themselves with either Zahid or Umno.

Najib stole taxpayers’ money in 1MDB, but if he were to be pardoned, what’s to stop him from stealing again?

The 1MDB scandal serves as a trial or test run for the hypothetical “2MDB”, and he would take more stringent steps so that this new crime would not be easily exposed as before.

If Najib is pardoned, then we should drop the “Supremacy of the Constitution” from the Rukun Negara. It becomes meaningless.

The whole country will be outraged as Najib has never expressed regret even when he was found guilty and fined.

His children and wife, and his hard-core supporters are in denial, and claim he is innocent.

Perhaps the one person who has the most to lose from Najib’s pardon is Anwar Ibrahim.

Around the world, governments are charging and sentencing people involved in the 1MDB scandal. A few banks have ceased operation and the activities of certain financial institutions have been intensely scrutinised.

Both Malaysia’s international and domestic credibility will be destroyed. How will we be able to attract anyone, both foreign and local, to invest in the nation?

We need to build the economy, but a pardon for Najib will not give investors much faith in our laws, and more importantly our judiciary.

We spent years bringing Najib to justice, waiting for the trial to complete whilst we watched him dodge his trials with sickness and other tactics.

If he were to be pardoned, Malaysians will wonder why we have waste hundreds of millions of ringgits and thousands of man-hours to build a legal case against him.

It is not just the court’s time, but the security detail involved, the witnesses, civil servants, lawyers, judges, the police, court officials, reporters, even the humble cleaning crew.

A pardoned Najib will not simply retire from politics and fade away from public life. He will have his revenge on those who betrayed him with their evidence presented in court.

The judiciary will receive the rakyat’s worst contempt. Their reputation will be decimated. They will face a backlash from the people.

Malaysians will be demoralised when corrupt politicians do not serve their full sentence, but only a fraction of it before they are pardoned.

No one will have any more respect for the judiciary. The rakyat will lose all their confidence in the legal system.

Malaysians work to take care of their families, help build the economy and develop the country. However, corrupt politicians who steal taxpayers’ money will endanger the community.

A pardon for Najib only proves that crime does pay.

If he were to be granted a pardon, other criminals would want one, too. The system will simply disintegrate.

As it is, those in jail for less serious crimes are not even being considered for a pardon. People will claim that the elite are favoured.

Perhaps the one person who has the most to lose is Anwar. His election manifesto about anti-corruption will become meaningless.

If Najib were to be pardoned, Anwar’s position as PM will be threatened. Both Malays and non-Malays will lose all trust in him. His Unity Government will disintegrate.

Granting Najib a pardon will pose a huge risk for the country. Both Malaysia’s future and honour will be at stake.

Source:

  1. Channel NewsAsia: How a royal pardon for jailed former PM Najib could rock Malaysia politics

(Mariam Mokhtar is a Freelance Writer.)

支持优质新闻或评论,欢迎送上一杯咖啡。

ADVERTISEMENT

1MDB
Mariam Mokhtar
Corruption
Najib Razak

ADVERTISEMENT

2 w ago
3 w ago
(吉隆坡5日讯)国际透明组织大马分会直言国内反贪污及相关案件中,越来越多以罚款、和解或撤销控状方式结案的趋势,并警告这么做可能影响公众对问责制度的信心。 该组织主席雷蒙蓝发文告指出,近日有报道指一名前公务员在缴付罚款后获撤销贿赂控状,引发社会对反贪案件处理方式的讨论。 促拟规范指南提高透明度 “我们呼吁律政署及反贪会在涉及罚款、和解或撤控的案件中提高透明度,并制定清晰指南规范相关机制。 “同时,加强监督与报告制度,并推动制度改革,包括研究将律政司和检察司分权,以强化问责与公信力。” 文告强调,尽管我国法律允许在特定情况下使用罚款、和解及其他酌情机制,且资产追回对挽回公共资金具有重要意义,但若缺乏完整司法审理以确认责任,可能对公众观感及法治信任带来影响。 文告指出,过去数年国内已有多宗高调案件以类似方式处理,包括与一马发展公司(1MDB)相关案件撤控、部分政治人物及涉贪与洗黑钱案件在缴付罚款后获释放等,引发社会关注。 该组织表示,虽然每宗案件均涉及不同法律与证据考量,但整体趋势已令部分公众形成印象,即贪污及相关案件可能越来越多以“财务解决”方式处理,而非通过全面审讯确定责任。 该组织指出,律政司依据联邦宪法拥有广泛检控酌情权,而部分罪行亦可依据2001年反洗黑钱、反恐融资及非法活动收益法令进行罚款处理,但相关权力的行使必须具备透明度与一致性,以维护公众信心。 资产追回不能取代问责 国际透明组织强调,资产追回不应被视为问责的替代方案,因为贪污不仅涉及金钱损失,更是对公共权力的滥用,会削弱治理体系及法治基础。 该组织警告,若长期依赖以罚款或和解方式处理案件,可能让社会产生“以钱解决问题”的观感,削弱反贪威慑力,并影响公众对执法机构的信任。 文告续指,尽管大马在最新清廉指数中有所改善,但要实现持续进步,仍需依靠透明制度、一致执法及强化公众信心,而不仅是资产追回成果。 文告补充,这并非反对资产追回机制,而是希望确保追回资金不能取代司法问责,并重申反贪工作不仅要有效,更必须公平透明。
4 w ago
4 w ago
4 w ago

Read More

ADVERTISEMENT