ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

3:25pm 05/04/2023
Font
Granting Najib a royal pardon is not justice
By:Mariam Mokhtar

Granting the convicted felon, Najib Abdul Razak, a royal pardon will open the flood gates to anger, and lead Malaysia down a path that will change the dynamics of the country.

How do you think the rakyat will react?

With a royal pardon, comparisons will be made. A desperate, unemployed father who was forced to steal to feed his children is jailed for three years. Najib who stole billions of ringgits has barely completed six months of his incarceration, and yet is allowed to roam free. Where is the justice?

Najib may be left smiling at his good fortune (of being released), but think how badly this will reflect on those who granted him the pardon?

The public will be wondering if the nation is in safe and capable hands.

Think how badly this will reflect on the prison population who probably stole less than Najib but received stiffer punishments.

The only difference is that they are not rich enough to afford a retinue of lawyers for the appeal process or find alternative solutions to be freed.

Think what it will do to the morale of the country.

We are already suffering the ill effects of the pandemic and global economic downturn, but Najib’s corruption will have crippled at least one or two generations of Malaysians forced to bear the brunt of Najib’s theft.

The money he stole could have been used to fund much needed public services like upgrading of schools, hospitals, infrastructure, or provide improved pay and work conditions to medical and teaching professions.

Just reflect on what foreign investors will think and do.

Industrialists will invest in a country with a stable political foundation, not one that is corrupt and lawless.

It is not just investors that we need to attract, but also tourist dollars.

A country that is tarnished because we are lenient with kelptocrats and corrupt leaders, does not augur well for our international image.

Malaysia has always had an impressive reputation overseas, but Najib spoiled that. If he were granted a royal pardon, we will be made a laughing stock.

Think of its effects on our judiciary.

Some Malaysians will wonder if justice is the privilege of the wealthy. Money can buy the super rich an endless round of lawyers willing to fight for them.

Perhaps a few will think that the judiciary is biased because the wealthy are given opportunity after opportunity of trying to find a legal loophole for release.

Granting Najib a royal pardon will open the flood gates to anger, and lead Malaysia down a path that will change the country’s dynamics.

Think of the reputation of the legal fraternity. Will their reputation sink like a lead balloon? Are they giving Najib sound advice or are they stringing him along and wasting Najib’s money and giving him false hope?

At the same time, taxpayers’ resources, money and manpower are unnecessarily wasted.

Each time there is a hearing, think of the time and money spent on the court officials, security details, reporters and policemen.

What is there to like about Najib?

He brought shame to the nation and his family.  He was given the responsibility of taking care of the nation, but he betrayed Malaysians by stealing from them.

He lied to the rakyat and sacked his critics. He lied to us and worse still was that members of his cabinet lied on his behalf, so much so that we lost trust in democracy and the institutions of state.

In 2017, Jeff Sessions, the then U.S. attorney-general described the 1MDB multi-billion dollar corruption scandal as the worst form of kleptocracy, and he said the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) would work towards providing justice to the victims.

Najib’s lengthy trial had been dogged by delays, and he was given ample opportunity to go through both the appeal and review processes.

He and his lawyers had tested the patience of the judiciary and general public, and despite his conviction being upheld, Najib is today still keen on pursuing a royal pardon.

Why? He is keeping to his selfish agenda!

Why put the country through yet another round of having to listen to him? His fingerprints were all over the place, and all the paper trails led to him.

The facts are that he stole, he was arrested, charged, and sentenced by three courts — High Court, Federal Court and Court of Appeal — and nine judges.

Last week, Najib’s review application in the RM42 million SRC International corruption case failed to quash his guilty verdict. The Federal Court bench, in a majority 4-1 verdict, rejected his review application.

Najib’s reason for demanding a royal pardon is based on the sole dissenting rule by Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak, Abdul Rahman Sebli.

Who does Najib think he is? The narcissist has failed to express remorse for his actions. He never apologized for putting the nation through so much suffering!

Najib was found guilty by 13 judges and is clutching at straws if he thinks that he can demand a royal pardon just because of one dissenting judge.

However, many people will question the royal pardon.

Criminals who have committed less serious crimes are not given such privileges. Granting Najib a royal pardon, will have serious consequences on the nation.

Sources:

  1. Reuters: Jeff Sessions calls Malaysia’s 1MDB scandal ‘kleptocracy at its worst’
  2. Malaysiakini: Shafee: Dissenting judgment in SRC review opens another avenue

(Mariam Mokhtar is a Freelance Writer.)

ADVERTISEMENT

1MDB
Najib Razak

ADVERTISEMENT

3 d ago
2 w ago
(吉隆坡5日讯)国际透明组织大马分会直言国内反贪污及相关案件中,越来越多以罚款、和解或撤销控状方式结案的趋势,并警告这么做可能影响公众对问责制度的信心。 该组织主席雷蒙蓝发文告指出,近日有报道指一名前公务员在缴付罚款后获撤销贿赂控状,引发社会对反贪案件处理方式的讨论。 促拟规范指南提高透明度 “我们呼吁律政署及反贪会在涉及罚款、和解或撤控的案件中提高透明度,并制定清晰指南规范相关机制。 “同时,加强监督与报告制度,并推动制度改革,包括研究将律政司和检察司分权,以强化问责与公信力。” 文告强调,尽管我国法律允许在特定情况下使用罚款、和解及其他酌情机制,且资产追回对挽回公共资金具有重要意义,但若缺乏完整司法审理以确认责任,可能对公众观感及法治信任带来影响。 文告指出,过去数年国内已有多宗高调案件以类似方式处理,包括与一马发展公司(1MDB)相关案件撤控、部分政治人物及涉贪与洗黑钱案件在缴付罚款后获释放等,引发社会关注。 该组织表示,虽然每宗案件均涉及不同法律与证据考量,但整体趋势已令部分公众形成印象,即贪污及相关案件可能越来越多以“财务解决”方式处理,而非通过全面审讯确定责任。 该组织指出,律政司依据联邦宪法拥有广泛检控酌情权,而部分罪行亦可依据2001年反洗黑钱、反恐融资及非法活动收益法令进行罚款处理,但相关权力的行使必须具备透明度与一致性,以维护公众信心。 资产追回不能取代问责 国际透明组织强调,资产追回不应被视为问责的替代方案,因为贪污不仅涉及金钱损失,更是对公共权力的滥用,会削弱治理体系及法治基础。 该组织警告,若长期依赖以罚款或和解方式处理案件,可能让社会产生“以钱解决问题”的观感,削弱反贪威慑力,并影响公众对执法机构的信任。 文告续指,尽管大马在最新清廉指数中有所改善,但要实现持续进步,仍需依靠透明制度、一致执法及强化公众信心,而不仅是资产追回成果。 文告补充,这并非反对资产追回机制,而是希望确保追回资金不能取代司法问责,并重申反贪工作不仅要有效,更必须公平透明。
2 w ago
3 w ago
3 w ago
1 mth ago

Read More

ADVERTISEMENT